arirangnews2013.3.6---北朝鮮停戰威脅的背後

arirangnews2013.3.6---北朝鮮停戰威脅的背後
Earlier in the week, North Korea caught the world by surprise yet again, by announcing that it would completely nullify the agreement that ended the Korean War 60 years ago. Our Han Da-eun looks at the significance of the truce, the secretive regime's possible intentions and the implications for South Korea. North Korea's threat to scrap the Korea Armistice Agreement has grabbed headlines worldwide. In South Korea, the impact of the threat has prompted the presidential office to convene a meeting of its National Security Council and the nation's defense ministry has vowed to strike back against any further North Korea provocations. The truce is significant because it's the one single pact that ensures the cessation of all hostilities on the Korean Peninsula until a peaceful way to end the war is found. It was under this agreement that the border between the two Koreas near the 38th parallel was established and the demilitarized zone created. The agreement also lays out concrete steps for putting a cease fire into force, including the authorization of a supervisory body, instructions for fixing the military demarcation line and the repatriation of war prisoners. The truce was signed by a U.S. Army official representing the United Nations, and officials from North Korea and China, but South Korea was left out of the agreement. Since then, North Korea has always asserted that any amendments to the armistice.. should be discussed by Pyongyang and Washington alone again, without Seoul. It's because of this that many experts say North Korea's abrupt threat to nullify the truce is not just aimed at South Korea, but also at the U.S. and China. Observers also say that amidst the expected tightening of UN sanctions and annual South Korea-U.S. joint military drills, the reclusive state has flashed the truce card to ramp up pressure on the U.S. and its closest ally. Some experts also say that Pyongyang is trying to gain leverage over the new Park Geun-hye administration in Seoul, before the newly elected president chooses to take a hard line on North Korea policy. They say that with the strong rhetoric from Pyongyang, the South Korean government will have to be more cautious when dealing with its communist neighbor. The views on whether the threat will lead to any actual military provocations by the north are mixed. But all agree that North Korea's verbal attacks will continue at least until the South Korea-U.S. military drills come to an end on March 21st. Han Da-eun, Arirang News.
在本週早些時候，朝鮮引起了全世界的驚喜再次宣布將完全無效的協議，結束了朝鮮戰爭60年前。我們的韓立沓，恩看起來在休戰的意義，的詭秘政權的可能意圖，並為南韓國。北韓國的威脅到報廢的朝鮮停戰協定“ 的影響已經抓住了全世界的頭條新聞。在韓國，威脅的影響有提示在總統辦公室召開的國家安全委員會和國家的防禦部已誓言，以取得回反對任何進一步的北韓國的挑釁會議。休戰是顯著，因為它是在1單協議，確保停止一切敵對行動，對朝鮮半島半島以和平方式結束戰爭，直到發現這是該協議還規定了具體的步驟，把停火生效本協議項下，在三八線附近的朝鮮半島南北雙方之間的邊界和非軍事區的創建。，包括授權的監督機構，固定的軍事分界線和遣返戰俘的指示。停戰協定上簽字的美國陸軍官員代表聯合國，並從朝鮮和中國，但韓國官員離開的協議。從那時起，朝鮮一直主張，任何修訂的停戰.. 應討論平壤和華盛頓單獨，無首爾。正因為如此，許多專家說，朝鮮的突然威脅到無效的休戰不只是目的是在韓國，但也為中國和美國。觀察員也說是一片聯合國的制裁和一年一度的韓國美聯合軍事演習的預期收緊，深居簡出的狀態閃現的休戰卡上升的壓力，美國和其最親密的盟友。一些專家也說，平壤正試圖獲得新的槓桿作用樸槿惠在首爾管理之前，新當選的總統決定採取強硬的對朝鮮政策。他們說，在激烈的平壤，韓國政府將不得不更加謹慎處理的共產主義鄰居時， 。是否威脅將導致任何實際的軍事挑釁北的意見被混合。但都同意，朝鮮的口頭攻擊，將繼續至少直到的南韓美軍事演習3月21日結束